Why Rastriya Swatantra Party should elect a new parliamentary party leader unanimously

Reports say the Rashtriya Swatantra Party (RSP) is facing some internal dilemmas regarding whom to elect its parliamentary party leader.

Keeping up with hope or terror? Case of COP 29 in Baku

It was last year during the COP28 in Dubai when I got to understand the complexities of the whole climate

More than a game: What Janakpur Bolts’ victory means for Madheshi people, for Nepal

On the surface, the Janakpur Bolts’ victory against the Sudurpaschim Royals in the finals of Nepal’s first-ever Nepal Premier League

An open letter to the king of Bhutan

His Majesty the King of Bhutan  Tashichho Dzong, Thimphu Your Majesty, On the auspicious occasion of the 117th National Day

Turmoil in Syria: Can Nepal offer any lesson?

Sudden, unexpected events at international levels can change your plans. This is what happened to me when I was preparing

Accountability Watch Committee raises alarm over big parties’ attempt to reduce punishment for those involved in war-era crimes 

‘Any decision made at any level that directly or indirectly undermines the rights of the victims of human rights violations cannot be sustained.’ 

Conflict victim nepal
Human rights activists observe a candlelight vigil for conflict victims on 19 June 2024 in Kathmandu.

Kathmandu: The Accountability Watch Committee (AWC) has expressed serious concern about reports from various media outlets that the top three political parties have agreed to stipulate a legal provision that guarantees a 75 percent reduction in punishment for those guilty of serious crimes committed during the armed conflict.

“The right to effective legal remedies is the soul of transitional justice. Any decision made at any level that directly or indirectly undermines the right of the victims of human rights violations cannot be sustained,” the AWC said. 

Stating that the right to effective remedies for victims is guaranteed under the Constitution of Nepal (Article 21) and international human rights standards accepted by Nepal (such as Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), the human rights body said this right remains immutable at all times (peace, armed conflict, or emergency) and cannot be overridden by any provision contrary to the Constitution and international human rights legal standards. The AWC has urged all actors involved in the process of amending transitional justice laws to keep this undeniable fact in mind.

The AWC has suggested that a balanced approach can be adopted where the court retains the authority to determine the appropriate degree of punishment based on an independent judicial evaluation of the aggravating and mitigating factors of an offense.

While demanding that the option reportedly negotiated among the top three parties that undermines criminal accountability for serious crimes should be abandoned, the AWC has called for rectifying flaws in the definition of gross violations of human rights, making the selection process of commissioners open and transparent, guaranteeing the full independence and autonomy of the commission, removing any barriers resulting from statutes of limitations for the prosecution of serious crimes, and clarifying that there would be a scope for prosecution against those unfit for amnesty and reconciliation. “These steps are necessary to address the legitimate demands of the victim community and civil society, which have been raised for years,” the AWC said.

“The AWC calls for the passing of the pending bill with these amendments, thereby ensuring the obstructed transitional justice process is brought back on the right track,” it has said.