Freedom of civic movement is the cornerstone of democracy. Civil society and non-governmental organizations should be recognized as essential partners in democratic governance. They often complement government efforts and help advance the overall goals of a democratic state. In fact, civil society groups are key instruments in building a just, inclusive, and democratic government in any country.
In recent weeks, many of us working to promote civil society in Nepal are deeply concerned about the proposed Social Development Bill. While we support good policies and better coordination, we worry that this bill should not have any provision that might limit, or restrict civil society organizations and their activities.
Personally, I believe civil society organizations must strive to ensure accountability and good governance. Financial integrity and transparency should never be compromised. However, the mistakes of some organizations should not undermine the entire civic movement. They should not be used as an excuse for actions that could result in the shrinking of civic space.
People in the government must recognize that civil society includes groups, networks, and voices that operate independently of the government. Civil society also plays the role of a watchdog. Together civil society groups play important role to hold those in power accountable.
We question harmful policies. We draw attention to service gaps. This does not mean we are anti-government. In a democracy, asking questions, giving feedback, and offering solutions should be welcomed. Such roles should not be discouraged or punished. This role of civil society should be seen as part of the process of strengthening democracy. No democratic government should view such activities as anti-government.
Nepal’s Constitution clearly guarantees the freedom of opinion, association, and peaceful assembly. These freedoms allow people to organize, express themselves, and take part in shaping society. Nepal has also signed important international agreements such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. These commitments remind us that we must protect civic space, not restrict.
In Nepal, civil society has supported peacebuilding, disaster response, health and education campaigns, gender equality, and climate justice. A democracy cannot thrive if the voices of its citizens are silenced. Restrictive laws send the wrong message. They create fear and prevent people from participating in any form of public accountability initiatives. Such laws weaken the trust between the state and its citizens.
Let us remember that democracy is not just about elections. It is about everyday participation. It is about transparency and accountability. It is about participation.
I believe it is the duty of political leaders, parliamentarians, the media, and citizens, among others, to stand up for civic space. Our collective voice must ensure that Nepal remains a country where civic space is not only protected but also promoted. Together with advocates of a liberal, open, and just society, we must remain vigilant to ensure that no law or policy undermines the foundations of civic freedom and democratic accountability in the country.
It is important at this time for political parties, their supporters, and other stakeholders to engage constructively and voice their concerns about any potential measures that may affect civic space.
Democracy thrives on inclusive dialogue and shared decision-making. Ignoring the voices and participation of all sectors erodes trust and weakens governance.
In conclusion, no decision about civil society should be made without wider consultations, active participation and ownership of civil society groups. That is supposed to be at the heart of Nepal’s democratic system under current constitution.
(The views expressed are drawn from an interview with Pralhad Dhakal, Country Director, Adara Development Nepal.)
Comment