The past year has been a stark reminder of Nepal’s vulnerability to natural disasters, with the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (NDRRMA) reporting 745 deaths across 8,861 incidents, alongside an economic toll of 3.13 billion rupees. From landslides claiming 351 lives to 4,145 fire incidents disrupting communities, the data paints a grim picture: 18,991 households affected, 1,702 injured, and 69 missing. These figures highlight an urgent need for transformative action to reduce loss and damage. A Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Strategic Plan offers a powerful framework to empower communities, enhance preparedness, and foster resilience. By integrating lessons from the 2024–2025 disaster trends, Nepal can shift from reactive measures to a proactive, community-driven approach that saves lives and livelihoods.
In Nepal’s rugged hills and sprawling Tarai plains, disasters strike relentlessly. Last year, the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority reported a grim toll: 1,005 landslides buried 351 lives, 4,145 fires claimed 77, and 418 floods drowned 97. Lightning claimed 78 lives, while 477 animal attacks and 1,195 forest fires added to the chaos. These tragedies shattered 18,991 households, costing NPR 3.13 billion and leaving scars of displacement and loss. Though Nepal has strengthened disaster management, gaps in prevention, early warnings, and community readiness remain glaring.
Hope lies in a new path—a Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Strategic Plan. Picture villages buzzing with radio alerts in local tongues, warning of landslides or floods. Unlike rigid, top-down orders, RCCE invites trust and dialogue, empowering farmers and herders with practical know-how. In fire-prone hamlets, families learn to store fuel safely; in flood zones, they map escape routes. From mountain slopes to riverbanks, RCCE equips communities to anticipate dangers, respond swiftly, and rebuild stronger.
The 2024–2025 data offers a roadmap for RCCE priorities. The dominance of fire incidents (4,145) calls for targeted campaigns on fire safety, especially in rural areas where open hearths and dry seasons amplify risks. Landslides, with 351 deaths, highlight the need for early warning systems and land-use education. Floods (97 deaths) and lightning strikes (78 deaths) demand community-based preparedness, while animal attacks (477 incidents) require localized conflict mitigation.
In a vibrant village nestled in Nepal’s hills, the community buzzed with a new sense of purpose. They had heard about too many tragedies—landslides sweeping away homes, fires raging through fields, and floods submerging lives. But now, they were ready to fight back, guided by a plan called Risk Communication and Community Engagement, or RCCE, that promised to make them stronger.
In a Nepali village, a Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) plan sparked resilience. First, the community buzzed with warnings in Nepali, Maithili, and local languages through radio, theater skits, and social media, teaching families from Tarai to mountains about landslides and floods. Then, trust grew as elders, women’s groups, and youth countered rumors, ensuring belief in alerts after 74 earthquakes. Next, villagers learned first aid, evacuation drills, and fire-resistant building techniques to combat 4,145 fire incidents, safeguarding homes. Finally, the plan included marginalized groups—women, Dalits, and indigenous families—collaborating on solutions like watchtowers and safe paths to address 477 animal attacks, ensuring everyone felt valued and protected. Through these steps, the village wove a shield of knowledge, trust, and togetherness. With the RCCE plan, they weren’t just waiting for the next disaster—they were ready to face it, united and unafraid.
The NDRRMA data highlights key disaster risks in Nepal, guiding RCCE interventions. Fires (4,145 incidents, 77 deaths) demand urgent campaigns promoting fire-safe practices like safe fuel storage and controlled burning, with community fire brigades conducting drills and urban areas like Kathmandu needing electrical safety awareness. Landslides (351 deaths) require geospatial mapping, community monitoring, and mobile alerts, alongside terracing, reforestation, and school programs to spot risks, addressing the 48 missing persons. Floods (418 incidents, 97 deaths) call for training in flood-resistant farming, evacuation planning, and embankment maintenance, using radio and street plays to share safety tips and prevent 18 disappearances. Lightning strikes (78 deaths) need awareness on seeking shelter and scaling up lightning rods through schools and cooperatives. Animal attacks (477 incidents, 43 deaths) in forested areas can be mitigated by engaging indigenous groups like Tharu and Chepang in solutions like watchtowers, chili deterrents, and safe forest navigation campaigns.
Nepal’s disasters disproportionately affect marginalized groups—women at risk during floods and animal attacks, children vulnerable to altitude sickness (24 cases), and indigenous communities facing wildlife conflicts. An RCCE plan must ensure inclusivity using visual aids, translators for languages like Tamang, and mobile units to reach 18,991 affected households. Economic losses of NPR 3.13 billion highlight the need for financial resilience through community savings, crop insurance, and disaster-resistant livelihoods like beekeeping to support 1,702 injured. Challenges such as rugged terrain, low literacy, and limited funding can be addressed by leveraging cooperatives, NGOs, radio, SMS alerts, storytelling, and festivals like Dashain. Sustained engagement requires drills, school clubs, seismic education (noting 74 earthquakes), and incentives like certificates or subsidies. The NDRRMA should draft a functional RCCE Strategic Plan as early as possible, piloting fire safety in Tarai and landslide alerts in Gorkha, scaling up by 2028 with budgets prioritizing local trainers and women-led efforts. The 745 deaths and NPR 3.13 billion losses demand action, as RCCE can empower citizens to build a resilient future where disasters don’t define Nepal’s destiny.
Comment